Social impact measurement is now a baseline expectation for organisations seeking to demonstrate value to funders, stakeholders, and the communities they serve. Yet despite its growing importance, the field remains fragmented, marked marked by inconsistent definitions, incompatible methodologies, and a persistent gap between what organisations report and what they can credibly demonstrate. As expectations rise, the limitations of existing approaches are becoming harder to ignore.
Understanding both the challenges and the emerging opportunities in social impact measurement is now critical for organisations serious about evidence-based practice.
Social impact refers to the meaningful, lasting changes that occur in communities as a result of interventions – changes in wellbeing, opportunity, resilience, and quality of life that persist beyond the immediate outputs of a programme. Unlike activity metrics, which remain essential for programme management and accountability, social impact measurement captures what communities actually gain. It shifts the lens from transaction to transformation and from outputs to outcomes.
The case for rigorous social impact measurement extends beyond accountability to funders, though this alone provides compelling motivation as donors increasingly demand evidence that investments generate genuine and sustained returns.
Effective measurement also enables strategic learning – identifying which approaches work, in which contexts, and why. It supports adaptive management by revealing where programmes succeed and where they require adjustment. Perhaps most importantly, demonstrating social impact builds organisational credibility and strengthens the case for continued investment in approaches that deliver proven results.
Despite its importance, social impact measurement presents significant difficulties that explain why many organisations default to simpler output metrics. Defining appropriate indicators requires expertise and consensus on what outcomes matter most, while collecting reliable data – particularly in resource-constrained or fragile settings – demands time and resources that compete with programme delivery.
Attribution poses another challenge. Communities experience multiple influences simultaneously, making it difficult to isolate the effects of any single intervention. Finally, the lack of standardised frameworks means that results rarely compare across projects, regions, or organisations, limiting sector-wide learning.
While these challenges are significant, they are not insurmountable. Advances in data collection, comparative research, and community-centred methodologies are making it possible to measure social impact with a level of rigour and consistency that was previously unattainable.
Addressing these challenges requires measurement approaches grounded in empirical research on what actually drives community resilience and development – approaches that are rigorous enough to satisfy academic and donor scrutiny yet practical enough for field implementation.
The most effective frameworks share several characteristics: they measure interconnected factors rather than isolated indicators, they enable comparison across contexts through standardised methodology, they capture community perceptions rather than relying solely on external assessment, and they translate complex dynamics into actionable intelligence.
The Community Strength Barometer (CSB) reflects this shift in how social impact is understood and measured. Drawing on Institute for Economics & Peace’s extensive research into the conditions that underpin peaceful and resilient societies, the CSB applies this robust, evidence-based framework at the community level.
By assessing communities across eight empirically validated pillars – from governance quality and resource distribution to human capital and social cohesion – the CSB enables organisations to move beyond proxy indicators and demonstrate genuine community-level change. In doing so, it transforms social impact measurement from an aspirational ideal into a practical, scalable reality that meets donor expectations and reflects community experience.
As expectations for accountability and evidence continue to rise, organisations that can credibly demonstrate social impact will be better positioned to learn, adapt, and deliver lasting outcomes. Community impact measurement tools such as the Community Strength Barometer turn one of development’s most persistent challenges into a strategic opportunity.
Explore how the Community Strength Barometer can strengthen your impact measurement at CSB: See how it works.
IEP has identified eight key factors, or Pillars, that comprise Positive Peace.
Analysing the factors that sustain peace.
Engage with the transformational Positive Peace program through research, workshops, education &...
