In theory, carbon markets steer investment to projects delivering emissions cuts. In practice, it’s a useful tool to transfer capital to developing economies.
China is set to launch the world’s largest carbon emissions trading scheme by 2025.
Carbon trading schemes have been on several countries’ agendas, but fiduciary, technical, and implementation challenges limited their execution.
Pakistan has abundant potential carbon mitigation and adaptation options and could benefit greatly from collaboration with China’s emission trading scheme.
A carbon market is one where you can buy and sell carbon credits, which have been validated by an independent expert source. Policymakers are once again advocating carbon markets to efficiently address global climate change and decrease carbon emissions.
Within a carbon trading framework, entities generate credits representing emissions cuts and sell them to other nations or companies seeking to offset their own pollution.
In theory, carbon markets help steer investment toward projects that deliver emissions cuts most efficiently. In practice, it is an efficient tool to transfer capital from developed to developing economies.
Pakistan’s history with carbon markets has been a series of fits and starts.
In 2005, Pakistan ratified the Kyoto Protocol. The protocol meant that Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) project activities in developing countries generated “certified emissions reductions”. Developed countries could then use credits from these activities to meet their emissions targets.
In 2010, the Pakistan government allocated funds for carbon trading in its annual budget.
However, by 2012, Pakistan’s share of CDM projects was less than one percent while China and India accounted for 60% and 30% of global CDM projects respectively.
In the budget for the fiscal year 2015-16, the Pakistani finance ministry allocated PKR 34 million (approximately USD 340,000) for carbon-neutral projects to help the industrial sectors sell and buy carbon credits in a local market.
In the same year, the government wrapped up the CDM cell in the Climate Change Division due to its poor performance.
The Act envisioned delegating responsibility to the Ministry of Climate Change (MoCC) for designing and establishing a national registry and database on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
It seemed to work on paper but not in reality. In 2018, the National Committee on the Establishment of Carbon Markets (NCEC) was formed to assess the country’s potential for implementing domestic and participating in international carbon markets.
The MoCC published a draft report on the introduction of carbon pricing instruments in Pakistan.
The report recommends implementing a domestic emissions trading scheme (ETS) in Pakistan that would initially cover large emitters from the power and industry sectors accounting for 168 Mt of CO2 equivalent emissions .
Pakistan has a ripe opportunity to link up with China’s program by developing carbon offsets locally and selling these to China . In its 14th five-year plan, China prioritized carbon trading, including online trading.
Pakistan can benefit in the following five ways:
An ETS requires a robust legal and regulatory framework. It outlines the activities that need to take place while specifying the scope, rules, and applicability of the program. Examples of these include monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) protocols.
Adopting the rules of its larger neighbor would be an easy first step.
Carbon markets would allow Pakistan to meet its Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) targets. Pakistan’s goal is to reduce emissions by up to 20% below Business as Usual (BAU) by 2030.
By making its own market compatible with that of China, Pakistan would greatly benefit through a positive ripple effect, as Chinese markets start to develop.
Pakistan could explore how the outcomes of projects like the PTI government’s flagship Ten Billion Tree Tsunami could be developed into a commodity that can be sold in international carbon markets.
Sustainable forestry management projects in Indonesia, have already secured carbon credits with a monetary value that benefits their developers. By applying lessons learned from Indonesia’s experience with sustainable forestry management, Pakistan can replicate these strategies.
Chinese companies might be able to offset their emissions by purchasing credits from Pakistan. That is, if such credits are developed in accordance with Chinese rules.
They would benefit from cheaper credits than their own market while Pakistan would benefit from the revenue generated.
An ETS is likely to create positive outcomes for public health, energy security, job creation, and land-use change; in particular, the long-term health benefits stemming from a reduction in local air pollution through climate mitigation policies.
By enriching projects through carbon credits, more such initiatives could be developed to benefit the local economy. Pakistan can also develop some new high-skilled jobs for the assessment of carbon credits and climate change.
Pakistan can also tap into alternative carbon markets such as voluntary emissions trading schemes.
Voluntary emissions trading schemes with impact quantification by independent certified bodies such as the Gold Standard would enable Pakistan to unlock private finance via carbon credits.
Private sector organizations and countries seeking to meet their emissions reduction targets under the Paris Agreement can finance a quantifiable impact on climate change.
In order to do this, they must purchase Emission Reductions the Gold Standard monitors, verifies and certifies.
Unlike developed countries that have already used up much of their carbon budget due to excessive industrialization, Pakistan profits from an abundance of natural resources. As a result, Pakistan has leeway to reduce more regarding forest protection and renewable energy.
The next Conference of the Parties (COP) is expected to formalize international trade in carbon credits under the Paris Agreement. Carbon pricing will be a key driver of efficiency in global emissions reductions.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Vision of Humanity.